#45 — GBP_USD small-box P&F sweep
Hypothesis — what it tests
Do sub-5-pip P&F boxes give GBP_USD (a low-spread, low-pip-value pair) a stronger FIFO-Trends edge than the standard 5-pip box?
Description
Follow-up to the ATR sweep's hint that GBP_USD prefers smaller boxes: a systematic FIFO-Trends sweep of fixed box sizes 2, 3, 4 and 5 pips on GBP_USD (48 configs per box size, same 3-stage IS-WF/MC/OOS pipeline). Results improved monotonically as the box shrank, with the best config b2_r3_n8_E2_X3c_1_5 reaching 54.52 p/d OOS versus 15.4 at the standard 5-pip box; every winning b=2 config required n_min=8, i.e. a 16-pip prior column as a strong directional filter before entry. The recorded caution was that a 1-box trail at b=2 is only 2 pips against a 1.8-pip median spread (+0.2p effective floor), so live profitability would have to come from column-SMA exits rather than trail exits. The config was deployed to the fx-fifo-paper service as GBP_USD_b2; in the Session 087 epilogue the whole FIFO paper book was stopped at -627.3p over 849 trades, with GBP_USD_b2 itself -99p — the spread consumed the trail in every variant.
Key result
Indicators
Algorithms
Code
Interactive version (search, filters, figures): the experiment explorer.