The Edge That Wasn't
All 81 experiments › #68

#68 — First-touch H4 low-volume reversion

2026-06-18 (v2 same day; trait-miner 2026-06-23; data 2021–2026)
Verdict: negative · ⛔ refuted — the +9.49p edge was a bar-grid (timezone) artifact
Fading the FIRST touch of a fresh H4 swing level on thin tick-volume scored +9.49 pips/trade net OOS (WR 54%, MC p=0.018) — refuted 2026-07-06: the study's H4 bars were UTC-midnight resamples; on the true NY-17:00 grid the signal scores −7.31 p/trade vs the coin arm's +3.52, ~11p worse than random, 0/4 gates.

Hypothesis — what it tests

Whether the first touch of a fresh H4 swing level mean-reverts (rehearsals deplete resting orders), and whether thin tick-volume at the touch (no breakout conviction) is the discriminating filter.

Description

Born from the user's reasoning that repeated touches consume resting orders, so the FIRST touch of a fresh H4 swing high/low should revert — and that a touch arriving on thin volume signals no breakout conviction. v1 (plain fade of touches≤1 with a ~48h hold, net spread) was already encouraging — positive in all three calendar thirds, stationary 2021→2026 — but not deploy-grade (per-trade MC P≈0.41, fat tails). The v2 upgrade the same day added an ATR target/stop (2·ATR each, 48h cap) and split trades by tick-volume at the touch: the low-volume half delivers OOS +9.49 pips/trade, WR 54%, MC P(≤0)=0.018, walk-forward positive in all 3 thirds (+2.9/+2.3/+14.7), 7/12 pairs OOS-positive (GBP_JPY flips −16 to +32 under the low-vol filter), while high-volume touches fail (−6.28p, P=0.88 — heavy volume means a genuine break). The user's third idea (sharper approaches revert more) did not hold. It fits the only surviving regime in the project — contrarian at structure with a multi-day hold that amortizes the spread — was deployed as the fx-first-touch-paper container, and a later trait-miner refined a +32p conviction-size overlay. Notably, the recipe does NOT generalize to previous-day-high/low levels — it is the level type, not the timeframe. Caveats: p=0.018 from one pass, and 5/12 pairs don't work.

Key result

loVol OOS +9.49 p/trade, WR 54%, MC P(≤0)=0.018, WF thirds +2.9/+2.3/+14.7, 7/12 pairs OOS+ (GBP_JPY −16→+32); hiVol −6.28p, P=0.88; v1 WF thirds L30H12 +5.2/+7.2/+10.6p; trait-miner refined overlay +32p | REFUTED 2026-07-06 (Entry 72): on the correct NY-17:00 H4 grid the signal is −7.31 p/trade vs coin +3.52p — a bar-grid artifact, 0/4 gates.

Indicators

H4 swing high/low levelstouch counttick volume (IS-median split)ATR (target/stop)net MFE

Algorithms

event-driven fade backtesttemporal walk-forward (thirds)Monte Carlo bootstrapLightGBM trait-miner (follow-up)IC screening

Code

Interactive version (search, filters, figures): the experiment explorer.

← #67 Structural fade at hourly S/R#69 ESCMA exit-learner (shock-entry + CMA-NN exit) →
This page is one experiment from the audited record behind the book The Edge That Wasn'tget the book · about the project.