#37 — FIFO-Trends proper live simulation (v2)
Hypothesis — what it tests
Does S5-resolution exit monitoring (submit market order within ~5s of the trail trigger) recover the FIFO-Trends edge that M5 bar-close management destroyed?
Description
Follow-up to the bar-close fill correction (Entry 36). The insight: a market order fills at the price prevailing at detection time, so fill quality depends on detection frequency. With M5 polling, detection lags up to 5 minutes and fills land at bar close (3-10 pips past the trail); with S5 (5-second) polling, S5 bars are only 0.1-0.5 pip wide, so fills land essentially at the trail level — equivalent to an OANDA broker-side trailing stop. The v2 backtest models this explicitly: trail exits fill at trail level (S5_MONITOR mode), X7 column-count exits fill at M5 bar close, with an M5_MANUAL reference mode showing the broken design. Under the realistic S5 model the original d=1 (5-pip trail) configs recovered strong out-of-sample results, and the conclusion was that the live service needed a separate S5 exit-monitoring loop.
Key result
Indicators
Algorithms
Code
Interactive version (search, filters, figures): the experiment explorer.