The Edge That Wasn't
All 81 experiments › #22

#22 — Weekend gap-fill backtest

2026-04-19 (data 2021-01 to 2026-04)
Verdict: mixed · 🟡 mixed — real tendency, fat tails
Fading the Friday-close→Sunday-open gap fills 92.2% of the time and is positive after spread on all 12 pairs, but hides 450–660-pip adverse tails.

Hypothesis — what it tests

Is trading against weekend gaps (betting the gap fills Monday) positive-expected-value after spread costs?

Description

A test of the classic folk hypothesis that the price gap between Friday's close and Sunday's open tends to 'fill' on Monday. For every weekend gap across 12 pairs over 5+ years (2,643 gaps), a trade was simulated against the gap, targeting the Friday close, with a 48-hour max hold and per-pair spread deducted. The tendency is real — 92.2% of gaps filled within 48h, +3.51 pips/trade net, all 12 pairs positive, with a 10–20-pip gap sweet spot — but 8 of the 10 worst adverse excursions came from a single weekend (the 2022-12-18 BoJ policy shift), drawing down 450–660 pips before 'eventually filling'. Because most gaps also move all pairs the same way (~1 effective trade, not 12), it was filed as a research finding, not a deployable strategy: it would need a hard stop, a central-bank calendar filter, and a correlated-exposure cap. Grouped in the audit table under the realizable-under-finite-margin theme — the average hides a tail the account cannot survive.

Key result

92.2% fill within 48h (2,436/2,643); +9,271 pips total net of spread; +3.51 p/trade avg; 12/12 pairs positive; best bucket 10–20p gaps (+4.88 p, 93% win); tails 450–660p adverse (8/10 worst from BoJ weekend 2022-12-18)

Algorithms

event-study backtestgap-size bucket analysismax-adverse-excursion tail analysis

Code

Interactive version (search, filters, figures): the experiment explorer.

← #21 CSI StrengthSpread campaign (stages 1–2)#23 FIFO-Trends 12-pair P&F sweep →
This page is one experiment from the audited record behind the book The Edge That Wasn'tget the book · about the project.